The Patriot Act has a larger purpose than could be imagined.

An incident was brought on his behalf because he was jailed for way too long with no charges filed against him along with other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It really is believed that this is only done so that the Supreme Court would not hear the case considering that the Bush Administration would have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed which had to complete because of the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been faced with lesser and less specific crimes though Attorney General Ashcroft had stated as he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. He was subjected to and the length of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial before he was set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that because of the torture. A judge ruled which he was competent and he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007).

On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to give it to the 8th of December, giving the energy towards the Federal Bureau of Investigation and many other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our constitutional rights. February 28th, 2011 was considered to be the final day for the Patriot Act since no legislation that is new been passed. With this particular extension, America waits for hearings to be held by the Judiciary Committee. When it came right down to voting when it comes to extension many Republicans voted for this and Democrats argued against the extension. However, that which was a surprise to many was the fact that sixty-five Democrats voted for the extension regarding the Patriot Act. One in particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the highest ranking democrat on the Intelligence Committee, wish to see this extension most of the way right through to 2013. Lots of the 27 Republicans who voted from the extension, such as for instance Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American individuals will face the best threat of out-of-control prosecutions plus the possibility of out-of-control spy networks effect that is taking.

Groups such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) plus the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform of this Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will take advantage of the bill and use of this capacity to trouble innocent people in the Muslim-American communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee from the significance of reform of this Patriot Act, arguing that the federal government track of communications with no proof is a violation of this peoples that are american basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to get reports on intelligence law violations through the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on more than one occasion to the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to are accountable to Congress any unlawful investigations under the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.

The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the charged power regarding the Patriot Act.

For example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens seeking to gain permanent residency, citizenship, visas and work permits in the United States are being scrutinized under the new requirement system for the Patriot Act. One very high ranking official in america Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) caused it to be clear then they will receive disapproval if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility. More stringent government standards and thorough background checks are only another obstacle created by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also opposed to most of the checks and balances through the Bill of Rights that was put into place to protect citizens’ privacy. At that moment, misuse of surveillance powers for legal reasons enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilising the internet into the privacy of their home feel a discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review in the event that government suspects these are typically engaging in anything terrorist related. For internet surfers, it opens the doorway for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and peer-to-peer systems. Also put in the midst of the arguments are companies and public libraries that have to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, in the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification for their customers.

I believe that one components of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not just from Congress, but additionally from the Supreme Court. Congress can may play a role by ensuring that the statutory laws they pass usually do not go against the protections promised to Americans in the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments associated with the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue to review cases to ensure that the Constitution is upheld even if it comes to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which can be American citizens. Our laws have made this country what it is but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation today. The freedom of life, liberty and property has turned into greed. Terrorist acts from the US terrify many Americans, but in many cases, money and power scares them more. The people vote to own government representation nevertheless the people have to be more involved in the decision making process. If you elect someone to office and additionally they usually do not do the job correctly, it is up to us as Americans to ensure that those individuals try not to remain in office. That can simply be done if people get more mixed up in process that is political not just be happy with how are you affected.

The expression “land associated with free” is employed too generously. Just how it is currently, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country is short for and deprives all of us of our civil liberties. Some argue that it is essential to maintain order, however you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect what to come out well. If the Patriot Act is to be kept as law, the individuals that individuals elect towards the House of Representatives (House) and Senate want to hold the individuals who put it to use accountable who overstep or abuse the ability given to them. Also, the president should not be the factor that is deciding deeming a person a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving an individual such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.

A brief history associated with Patriot Act actually dates back to your century that is eighteenth different laws placed into place during war time and energy to protect the US.

The protection of our nation may be the highest while the most important responsibility of our government. The laws created are meant to be in the best interest of this citizens. Most likely, the citizens provide the government the energy to maintain their welfare and to protect them. People with this level of power sometimes concentrate on your whole without rational plus the individual has got to pay the price. There should be a limit on the power of the government, if the way that is nation’s of, liberty and pursuit of property are in jeopardy we have to think about the rational the us government uses when governing this nation. We can not as a nation just sit back and accept what is being done. In order to elicit change, we must stand up and do some worthwhile thing about it.